MEDICAL PRIESTS (MDs) HIDE BEHIND RABBIS' ROBES...
Pseudonymous usenet pediatrician PF Riley, MD once wrote:
"I wouldn't give a flying fuck if none of my patients were circumcised."
Yep - there are only "potential" medical indications.
"Potential" medical indications was the pediatrician gag when AAP tried to
find medical indications to buttress the California Medical Association's
brand new, MDs-stay-out-of-prison "effective public health measure.
I had just exposed pediatrician perpetuation of phony "babies can't feel
PF Riley, MD is pretending infants don't scream as MDs literally rip and
slice their penises...
Post by PF Riley Post by wc
I have witnessed hundreds of male circumcisions. There is a special
board the infant is strapped to. They DO SCREAM, and there is
NO anesthesia injected. I have never seen an infant given anything
to pacify it, and they don't lie there and stare at the ceiling. They
scream, you fool.
OK, people in third world countries don't count. Gastaldo is
complaining about American "MDs".
OF COURSE GASTALDO IS COMPLAING ABOUT AMERICAN MDS!!
Pseudonymous usenet pediatrician PF Riley, MD pretends that American
medicine's most frequent surgical behavior is not assault and battery on a
child - not mass child abuse by MDs.
Unless babies are rendered unconscious by the pain, most babies scream and
writhe. Some die or get infected and lose their penises - though
fortunately death and penile loss are rare.
FACT: In 1987, I discovered pediatricians perpetuating American medicine's
phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology.
That was over two BILLION dollars' worth of infant screams ago.
I am in favor of a religious exemption from the child abuse laws for the
ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on the penis...
1. Whereas the ancient Jewish ritual leaves most of the foreskin on the
penis - the medical ritual involves TOTAL foreskin amputation.
2. Whereas Jews sincerely believe their God commands circumcision - MDs are
blase about their total foreskin amputation ritual...
Blase... For the longest time, MDs used phony neurology to claim that
babies can't feel pain; and, as quoted above, pseudonymous usenet
pediatrician PF Riley, MD once wrote:
"I wouldn't give a flying fuck if none of my patients were circumcised."
American pediatricians KNOW their grisly total foreskin amputation ritual is
mass child abuse.
THE MD COVER-UP: American MD priests hid behind the rabbis' robes...
In an Oct. 11, 1987 letter, I noted pediatricians perpetuating American
medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain" neurology and demanded an end to
the "no medical indications" partial penile amputation.
I copied the New England Journal of Medicine.
The Nov. 19, 1987 New England Journal of Medicine suddenly ran Anand and
Hickeys' article admitting the phony neurology - along with an editorial
stating that BABIES incur the pain of their circumcisions! (Anand later told
me that the Journal had been sitting on his article for over a year - it was
"too inflammatory" they told him.)
In November/December 1988, I wrote to Congress calling for a religious
exemption for the ancient Jewish ritual.
In January 1988, the pediatricians (the journal PEDIATRICS) came out against
ALL religious child abuse exemptions.
In February 1988, the pediatricians came out for anonymity of PERPETRATORS
of child abuse.
In March 1988, the California Medical Association/CMA suddenly - by voice
vote of its House of Delegates - declared the obvious "no medical
indications" child abuse to be "an effective public health measure." (The
CMA had to ignore its own Scientific Board which had recently squashed a
nearly identical resolution.)
CONTINUING to lie to parents to obtain "informed consent" - THAT is child
Sticking needles into baby penises to anesthetize (cover-up) child abuse -
that too is child abuse.
Attempting to soothe the baby with a sucrose pacifier as his penis is
literally ripped apart and his foreskin amputated - that too is child abuse.
Mark Lowry, III, MD writes: "A pacifier dipped in sugar actually goes a
LONG way toward
palliating an infant undergoing a circumcision."
Hillary Israeli, VMD replied: "Or [one dipped in] Manischewitz [wine], for
These MD/VMD cover-up behaviors are just as illegal as the grisly partial
penile amputation itself.
Some babies die or get infected and lose their penises; and though death and
penile loss are rare - screaming and writhing and bleeding are not - even
when sucrose/wine pacifiers are used...
Mark Lowry, III, MD acknowledged the screams to "wc"...
"Yes, some babies do scream...You are wrong to state that there is no
anesthesia. Most doctors
(at least those who have been trained in the last 15 years or so) use
a locally injected anesthetic to address pain. Those who don't are
ignorant dinosaurs, IMNSHO."
Mark is wrong to pretend that - with or without anesthesia - American
pediatricians are not violating their own stated ethics (see below; not to
mention penal laws against child abuse)...
Even if only "some" babies are screaming - anesthetized child abuse is still
Here two nurses discussed the screams...
"After years of strapping babies down for this brutal procedure and
listening to their screams, we couldn't take it any longer." [Sperlich
BK, Conant M. Am J Nurs (Jun)1994:16. http://www.cirp.org/nrc/]
Here's a nurse calling it "barbaric"...
"Nursing alert...[N]urses must consider their participation in a
surgical procedure that involves no anesthesia to be a barbaric
practice." (p. 205) Donna L. Wong's Essentials of
Pediatric Nursing 
Here's an MD calling it "barbaric"...
"[S]till all too often barbaric...[M.D.s]...would never allow older children
or adults to be subjected to such practices, nor would they submit to it
themselves..." [Veteran circumcision cheerleader Colonel Thomas E. Wiswell,
MD in article in the April 24, 1997 New England Journal of
In 1980, one pediatrician correctly identified the mass child abuse:
"[Routine infant circumcision] constitutes child abuse...an acknowledged
hazard to health." [Michael Katz, MD: Letter. AJDC, 1980]
In 1986, another pediatrician wrote:
"What a terrible indictment...guilty of failing those for whom we have
chosen to be advocates." [Finkel KC: The failure to report child abuse.
American pediatricians who perform routine infant circumcisions violate
their own ethics:
"[T]he pediatrician's responsibilities to his or her patient exist
independent of parental desires...
"...A[n infant's screaming writhing and bleeding obviously constitutes
the - TDG] patient's reluctance or refusal to assent [and - TDG]
should...carry considerable weight when the proposed intervention is not
essential to his or her welfare
and/or can be deferred without substantial risk...
"[T]hose who care for children need to provide for measures to solicit
assent and to attend to possible abuses of 'raw' power over children when
ethical conflicts occur."
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS
Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric
Pediatrics Volume 95, Number 2 February, 1995, p. 314-317
Pseudonymous usenet pediatrician PF Riley, MD is perpetuating the mass child
abuse COVER-UP as his fellow MDs engage in mass child abuse.
It is time to EXEMPT the ancient Jewish ritual that leaves most of the
foreskin on the penis...
It is time to END the medical ritual - and instantly save America the
estimated $400 million dollars per year spent on organized medicine's
ongoing child abuse for profit scheme.
As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. MDs are just
academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental
meatgrinder - medical school.
As medical students, MDs are TRAINED to perform grisly felonies.
For a discussion of the other grisly felonies performed by MDs...
See SLAPP: How MDs get away with grisly felonies: Censor Bob Dubin, DC and
the Schroeder-SLAPP-censored chirolist
Thanks for reading,
PS Of course, MDs don't need to stop their felonies and don't need pardons
in advance because it is legal for them to commit felonies - or rather - MDs
**will not be prosecuted** for their felonies by district attorneys and
attorney generals - the other parties who run the medico-"legal" "just us"
You know, admitting that fact - finally ARTICULATING that fact - *really*
helps. My thanks to the women on misc.kids.pregnancy who encouraged me to
openly acknowledge the futility of thinking MDs are equal under the law.
Hopefully, a parent or two reading this has decided not to pay an MD to
commit child abuse on their infant son.
The vast majority of babies do not lose their lives or their penises - but
some do - most "only" scream and writhe and bleed - or maybe only "some"
scream - per Mark MD's comment above.